Papers

Filtered to benchmarking · clear filter

Browse by term

continual learning 91reinforcement learning 43vision-language models 18benchmarking 12benchmarks 11robotics 11large language models 10language models 9world models 9video generation 6generative models 5multimodal models 5natural language processing 5recursive self-improvement 5video world models 5agents 4dialogue systems 4diffusion models 4foundation models 4multimodal large language models 4on-policy distillation 4reasoning 4self-distillation 4self-supervised learning 4conversational AI 3evaluation benchmarks 3human-computer interaction 3LLMs 3multi-agent systems 3policy optimization 3

Matching papers

BDH-CQ: In-Context Learning with Recurrent Latent Reasoning

548 upvotes · 10 AUG 2026 · Björn Engdahl, Adrian Kosowski, Jan Chorowski et al.

This paper introduces a new AI model called BDH-CQ that can learn from context and reason iteratively without verbalizing its steps. Practitioners might care because this model achieves a high level of performance while being very efficient, which could be useful for applications where resources are limited.

ChronoReplay: One Answer Interface Is Not Enough for Streaming Spatial Intelligence

340 upvotes · 25 OCT 2026 · Yihao Hu, Yitong Lin, Pan Wang et al.

This paper addresses a problem in training spatial vision-language models (VLMs) where the model becomes specialized in answering certain types of questions, but loses its ability to perform well on others. A new method called ChronoReplay is proposed to improve the model's ability to generalize across different question types.

StreamEval: Evaluating Interactive Streaming Video Generation Models

292 upvotes · 20 OCT 2026 · StreamEval Team

This paper introduces a benchmark, StreamEval, to evaluate interactive streaming video generation models, which is essential for enabling real-time interaction with generated video in applications like streaming services. Practitioners caring about the development of interactive video generation systems will find this paper useful.

HarnessDev: Can LLMs Create and Evolve Their Own Agent Harness?

236 upvotes · 1 SEP 2026 · Yuhao Wu, Jingyuan Zhang, Jiajun Shi et al.

This paper creates a benchmark (HarnessDev) to test whether large language models (LLMs) can design and improve their own execution infrastructure, called the agent harness, which affects their performance. Practitioners might care because it explores how models can adapt to changing environments and potentially improve efficiency.

AgentSWE: Can Coding Agents Build the Agent You Actually Want?

201 upvotes · 9 OCT 2026 · Jiahao Wang, Hongjin Qian, Yuyang Hu et al.

This paper creates a benchmark to test how well coding agents can build agents that meet their users' needs, and it finds that most agents fail to deliver what they promise. Practitioners might care because it highlights the need for better evaluation methods to ensure agents are built to meet user requirements.

AREX: Towards a Recursively Self-Improving Agent for Deep Research

142 upvotes · 23 JUL 2026 · Shuqi Lu, Chaofan Li, Kun Luo et al.

This paper introduces AREX, a self-improving agent that recursively refines its answers by verifying intermediate results and using the partially verified state to guide subsequent refinement, aiming to improve the efficiency of deep research. Practitioners might care about AREX's approach to reducing the cost of discovery and verification in complex research tasks.

EarlyEval: Cheaper Agent Evaluation via Early Outcome Prediction

110 upvotes · 2 SEP 2026 · Yuling Shi, Zhensu Sun, Junsen Dong et al.

This paper introduces EarlyEval, a method to reduce the cost of evaluating large language model (LLM) agents by predicting their outcomes early, allowing for earlier termination of agent runs. Practitioners may care because it can significantly reduce the computational cost of agent development.

DataFlex-RL: An Evaluation Platform for RLVR Data Policies

109 upvotes · 5 SEP 2026 · Hao Liang, Mingrui Chen, Hengyi Feng et al.

This paper introduces DataFlex-RL, an evaluation platform for comparing different data policies in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), and finds that uniform data policy leads to better performance and is more reproducible than other methods. Practitioners might care about this because it provides a way to compare different data policies and ensure that their RLVR models are performing well.

InteractiveWorld: A Verifiable Human-Centric Environment for Building Better Interactive MLLM Assistants

109 upvotes · 25 OCT 2026 · Qinsi Wang, Wei Wen, Chong Zhou et al.

This paper creates a simulated environment where a human and AI assistant interact, allowing researchers to test how well AI assistants can guide humans in the physical world. Practitioners might care because it could lead to more reliable AI assistants that can truly help people with tasks like remembering what to do.

AI4AI at Test-Time: Strong-to-Weak Capability Transfer via Harnesses

107 upvotes · 12 AUG 2026 · Cheng Qian, Wenting Zhao, Liangwei Yang et al.

This paper explores a new approach to transferring capabilities from strong AI models to weaker ones at test time, rather than just during training. Practitioners might care about this because it could lead to more efficient and effective use of powerful models in real-world applications.

SoL-Pi: Recursively Scaling Auto-Research Loops for Efficient Agent Harness

94 upvotes · 17 SEP 2026 · Haozhe Liu, Tian Ye, Sensen Gao et al.

This paper develops a method to efficiently scale agent research loops, allowing for more effective self-improvement and reusable improvements across diverse environments. Practitioners might care about this research because it could lead to significant cost savings and improved performance in automated code completion and generation tasks.

VibeVideoBench: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Code-Driven Video Generation

89 upvotes · 27 OCT 2026 · Muxi Diao, Wenbin Xu, Lele Yang et al.

This paper evaluates how well multimodal agents can generate videos that include synchronized code, sounds, and on-screen events, and why a practitioner might care because it could lead to more realistic video generation in applications like educational content, music videos, and video games.