This paper tests how well AI agents can withstand prolonged interactions and unexpected events, and finds that even seemingly safe agents can fail in complex, long-term scenarios. Practitioners should care because it highlights the need to design more resilient autonomous systems that can handle unexpected failures.
Firehose
Filtered to tagged “autonomous systems” · clear filters
Browse: People · Companies · Papers · Podcasts · Hacker News · Deep dives
Browse by tag
artificial intelligence 89continual learning 27AI 23AI safety 13reinforcement learning 13agentic coding 12open-weight models 12AI agents 10machine learning 9AI ethics 8cybersecurity 8existential risk 8language models 8natural language processing 8ethics 7Reinforcement learning 6Diffusion models 5large language models 5multi-agent systems 5open-source 5recursive self-improvement 5robotics 5security 5software development 5Agentic AI 4artificial general intelligence 4mathematics 4Recursive self-improvement 4agents 3AI infrastructure 3
Gary Marcus partially endorses Dario Amodei's essay "We Must Pace the Frontier," which advocates for slowing down AI development and proposes a three-part plan for doing so. Amodei's proposal includes providing third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to Anthropic's systems, a move that has raised concerns about regulatory capture and the potential for bias. Amodei's plan also sidesteps other policy options, such as liability and product recalls, that some argue could be more effective in addressing AI safety concerns. AI summary
This episode features Qasar Younis and Peter Ludwig, co-founders of Applied Intuition, discussing their company's mission to build physical AI for various moving systems like cars, trucks, and mining equipment. They delve into the evolution…